Le Dehaan, David Van Tassel, Jim Anderson, Sean Asselin, Greg Baute, Doug Cattani, Steven Culman, Kevin Dorn, Brent Hulke, Michael Kantar, Steven Larson, David Marks, Allison Miller, Jesse Poland, Damian Ravetta, Emily Rude, Matthew Ryan, Donald Wyse, Xiaofei Zhang
Abstract: In recent decades, in the interest of diversifying the global food system, improving human nutrition, or making agriculture more sustainable, there have been many proposals for domesticating or completing the domestication of wild plants or semi-domesticated “orphan” crops. However, very few new crops have been fully domesticated. Many wild plants have traits preventing their production or consumption that could be costly and slow to change. Others may have fortuitous pre-adaptations that make them easier to work with or feasible as specialty (albeit low yielding) crops. Here we propose a “pipeline” approach with attrition expected as species passing through the pipeline are occasionally eliminated. We list criteria for ranking candidates to help enrich the starting pool with the more pre-adapted, promising species. We also discuss strategies for prioritizing initial research efforts once the candidates have been selected: developing higher value products and services from the crop, increasing the potential supply of the crop, and focusing on overcoming traits that make the plant unattractive to researchers, farmers, and consumers in the short term regardless of potential value or seed yield. New-crop case studies are presented to demonstrate that wild species’ limitations and potential may only be revealed during the early phases of domestication. Candidates dropped from the pipeline in early phases should be viewed not as failures but as evidence of dispassionate evaluation. In other examples, serious barriers to increasing yield potential, such as low seed mass and low seed number per head were overcome relatively efficiently, leading to increased confidence, farmer collaboration, and program expansion.
To view article click here.